tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6836726.post2110741593388267253..comments2024-02-16T11:06:49.575-05:00Comments on entropy bound: Talk Like A Physicist Day, but not on WikipediaPeterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14862709994959103798noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6836726.post-28847433251842741912008-03-14T14:33:00.000-04:002008-03-14T14:33:00.000-04:00I do not entirely understand the problem. The APS...I do not entirely understand the problem. The APS grants authors the ability to post their articles on their own websites and make them available for free download. These particular authors can make all of their work accessible in this way. <BR/><BR/>Also, Wikipedia specifically rejects original research and asks only for established fact. So, it would seem that anything recently published is not fit for Wikipedia because there is still the possibility that someone will disprove it or a retraction might be required for some other reason. If the author(s) continue to publish quality work in their field, then it is possible that they will get an "External Link" from the relevant Wikipedia page to their professional page.<BR/><BR/>Am I missing another angle to this issue?David Pacehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03735043697309182890noreply@blogger.com